Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01239
Original file (PD2012 01239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD1201239
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130718
SEPARATION DATE: 20040118


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-3 (95B/Military Policeman) medically separated for mid and low back pain. In April 2002, during Advanced Individual Training (AIT), the CI reportedly slipped and fell while climbing a rope and landed on his buttocks. He did not seek treatment until he arrived at his first duty station several months later. He was seen by physical therapy and physical medicine and rehabilitation with no reported improvement. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The IPEB adjudicated “chronic mid and low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Back injury is preventing me from securing specific employment. This lead to anxiety, depression and adjustment issues. I was treated with narcotics while on active duty. Unfortunately this lead to an addiction. I went to rehab and I am in recovery. Due to my addiction and transportation issues and impaired judgement I missed many appointments. I suffered from anxiety, adjustment issues and depression since discharge from active duty. I was medically discharged.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The anxiety, depression, adjustment issues, and drug addiction conditions specified in the application were not identified and adjudicated by the PEB, and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20031027
 VA - (4.5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Mid and Low Back Pain 5237 10% Bulging Disc at T11-T12 5243 0%* 20040603
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 0 20040603
Rating: 10%
 Rating: 0%


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

Back Pain, Disc Protrusion T11-T12. The narrative summary dated 5 September 2003 noted the intermittent mid-back pain began after the CI fell from a rope during AIT in April 2002. Magnetic resonance imaging on 28 May 2003 showed small disk protrusion with minimal right anterior cord defect at T11-T12 level, “probable Gibbs artifact from spinal fluid flow overlying the central cord at roughly T7.” Treatment records were scarce beginning with the time of injury, with a total of three in 2002 and two in 2003, although an additional two were referenced in the NARSUM. Treatment records indicated the CI participated briefly in physical therapy and reported pain relief with medication and therapy. At the physical therapy follow up visit dated 24 April 2003, approximately 9 months prior to separation, the CI indicated his pain was responsive to medication and he experienced some irritation with firing on the rifle range. Range-of-motion (ROM) recorded during physical therapy visit on 7 October 2003, approximately 3 months prior to separation, revealed thoracolumbar flexion at 110 degrees and extension at 10. Treatment note dated 27 February 2003 recorded the CI underwent high velocity, low amplitude back manipulation procedure to correct a small thoracic subluxation. There were no other treatment entries that referenced a subluxation or any pathological symptoms or sequelae of a subluxation. The CI’s profile allowed him to perform knee bender, upper/lower back stretches, upper and lower body weight training, run and swim at own pace and march up to 10 miles and lift up to 60 pounds. At the MEB/NARSUM exam, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported mid-back pain at rest of 1/10. Pain level during periods of exacerbation was noted on the scale of one to 10 as an 8 and lasted a few seconds. The CI noted aggravating factors were twisting motion or standing for greater than an hour. He noted his pain had decreased and resolved over time and reported he had approximately 4-5 additional episodes of pain exacerbation after a period of remission. The MEB examiner referenced the musculoskeletal examination performed by sports medicine that recorded tenderness to palpation of T10-T12, no signs of inflammation or deformity, with ROM of 80 degrees on forward flexion, without pain, and 20 degrees of extension with pain. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination dated 3 June 2004, approximately 4 months after separation, the CI reported a chronic low-grade pain in the lower thoracic region, 3 on a scale of 10. Prolonged standing or sitting in a single position evoked more pain. He stated he could not run because of back pain but was able to use a stair stepper and exercise in the gym 5 days a week. The CI indicated he was working in sales at Home Depot and attending college. Physical examination of the spine recorded a ROM of forward flexion at 95 degrees and extension of 30 degrees without noted pain on motion, and no lack of endurance. The physician noted lumbar radiographs were done in error, however, revealed no evidence of compression, or vertebral deformity or disc space narrowing.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition 10%, coded 5237 (lumbosacral strain) with the notation of full ROM, no spasm or radiculopathy. The VA assigned a non-compensable evaluation of 0%, coded 5243, citing full ROM, lack of pain and no lack of endurance on examination. A higher rating of 20% under code 5237 requires spasms producing abnormal gait or abnormal curvature of the spine or forward flexion not greater than 60 degrees, not supported by the evidence in record. The Board agreed there was pain supporting the 10%; however, there is insufficient evidence to support the higher rating of 20%. The Board reviewed the treatment records and noted there was no evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment in this case, no episodes of incapacitation, and no muscle weakness with loss of function, therefore, code 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome) was not applicable. The Board unanimously agreed the mid-back condition did not rise to a level of compensability under §4.59 or §4.40. There is no VASRD sanctioned pathway to a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the back condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Mid and Low Back Pain 5237 10%
RATING 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120720, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

invalid font number 31502 SFMR-RB                                                                         

invalid font number 31502
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / invalid font number 31502 XXXXXX invalid font number 31502 ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 invalid font number 31502 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502 , AR20130021922 (PD201201239)
 invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:


 invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX invalid font number 31502
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01569

    Original file (PD-2013-01569.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20041103VA – 88 Months Post-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Radiating LBP 52420%Chronic LBP5237NSC20120529Left Toe...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01649

    Original file (PD2012 01649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.For a rating recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must apply the 2002 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine. BOARD FINDINGS : The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the chronic mid and upper back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00698

    Original file (PD2013 00698.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ; No muscle spasm invalid font number 31502 Also noted in evidence was a VA PT exam dated 13 months after separation that documented “Trunk ROM is limited 50% flexion, lateral flexion left and 25% rotation left. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD, scoliosis and strain condition as 5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine, rated at 20% based on a forward flexion of 40 degrees.The general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “With or without...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00161

    Original file (PD2013 00161.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ratings for the unfitting neck and back conditions are addressed below. The PT note on 16March 2007, 3 months prior to separation recorded bubble inclinometer ROM without specification of the method used, or normal values, at flexion 21 degrees, and extension 9 degrees with pain.The MEB NARSUM exam on 23 April 2007, approximately2 months prior to separation, documented that the CI’s LBP symptoms had slowly worsened and that he had undergone rest, activity modification, anti-inflammatory...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01924

    Original file (PD 2014 01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20080711VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Lumbar DDD523710%Lumbar DDD with Radiculopathy524220%STROther X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090124 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. A...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01209

    Original file (PD-2013-01209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was medically boarded out of the Army at this time.” The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, without Significant Neurologic Abnormality5299-523720%Thoracic Spondylosis to include Dextroscoliosis524240%20040810Other x 0 (Not In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00261

    Original file (PD-2014-00261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Herniated Disc L4-5 with DDD524320%Lumbar Spine Strain523740%20070829Sciatic Nerve with L1-4 RL Radiculopathy852020%20070829Other x2 (Not in Scope)Other x920070829 Combined: 20%Combined: 90%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20071023 (most proximate to date of separation) invalid font number 31502 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00037

    Original file (PD-2014-00037.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The VA exam was closest to the date of separation and documented worsened pain-limited ROM than the MEB exam. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01553

    Original file (PD-2013-01553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back and left shoulder conditions, characterized as “left shoulder rotator cuff tear, status post(s/p) repair and back pain secondary to T12 compression fracture” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the...